Archive for the ‘evangelicals’ Category

Evangelicals Need Abortion

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

From a purely political perspective I can understand how the evangelicals still cling to the abortion issue. Continually waving this flag is their only hope of keeping the Republican Party paying attention to them and granting them a larger voice than their numbers actually merit. It is their best strategy and has worked well for nearly four decades. So long as they remain the uncompromising standard-bearers of this issue they can guilt the rest of the party – which generally agrees with them though not quite so radically – into giving them a healthy dose of the party’s power. It has been the key to their success within the party and, when observed from without, the thing that has brought the party close to splintering and collapsing.

As Republicans realize that allowing the evangelical wing to control so much of their party could lead to its downfall many are starting to drift away from their extreme christian position. True to form the evangelicals refuse to compromise and work within the party. Instead they’ve stiffened their backs. They send murders into legally operating clinics to kill the doctors and nurses that run them. Openly, of course, most evangelicals condemn the actions of their christian soldiers while privately they rejoice. Don’t argue with me on this point. I’ve witnessed it.

At the same time they participate in some brilliant Rovian jujitsu and accuse the Democratics of being as bloodthirst as they actually are. Here’s a great example of what I’m talking about – Obama, younger evangelicals and a true pro-life agenda. On the face of it this seems like a fairly reasonable article about the stand-off over this issue. But the language of it is so hateful and filled with accusations to the Democratic Party and specifically the Obama administration that one can’t help but walk away with a residue of fear and loathing. The author repeatedly calls them pro-abortion. This is a most offensive idea. Nobody is pro-abortion. Let me say that again, nobody is pro-abortion. No one delights when a woman has to make this choice and to imply they do is deeply offensive. The hope appears to be that blasting Democrats with their hate will reinstate evangelicals to their former place of power within the party. The enemy of my straw-man enemy is my friend.

Again, I can understand this thrashing about. The evangelicals are afraid of losing the party they so carefully and meticulously hijacked. Let’s hope that Republicans will continue to realize that they’ve sold their soul for this single issue and start to take their party back from the christianist faction.

WDWJPF – Whose Death Would Jesus Pray For

Monday, June 15th, 2009

There’s not really a lot to say about this one. Most rational people can see the insanity to which evangelicals have sunk when one of their leaders speaks this way. The absolute stupidest part about this whole affair is that Obama is a christian!

But anyway, here we go. Take a listen to reverand Wiley Drake declaring that he actively prays for the death of the President of the United States.  By the way, I looked up imprecatory as it was a new word for me.  Its base verb, imprecate, means “to invoke evil on” according to Websters Ninth.

Gitmo’s still open, isn’t it?

Claiming Biblical Principles as US Territory

Friday, June 12th, 2009

Now here’s an amazing christian screed. Its author, Roger Mullins, is definitely going on my must-read list if for no other reason than his entertainment value.

There are plenty of factual errors, overstatements and outright baffling claims made here. I want to focus one just one because, among them all, this is the only one that I haven’t encountered elsewhere before. It’s rare to find an original misstatement among these folks – another reason to add him to my reading list.

Mullins says “What was “popular” or “politically correct” was not taken into consideration when our leaders in that day drafted our Constitution and our Declaration of Independence. Which, by-the-way, made us the first and only country in the history of the world to have its government and society founded on predominantly Biblical principles.”

Really? OK, I’ll admit that the qualifier predominantly can make this an argument of greys. Plus the fact that he’s probably a Protestant evangelical – if it quacks like a duck – and rejects the idea that catholic equals biblical but still! Has Mullins never heard of the Vatican? That’s a country. And as the seat of the catholic church I think that it would be heard to deny that it was founded on biblical principles.

But setting that obvious example aside, how many other countries are based on principles or doctrines that can be argued to be as christian as those that established the US. (I question that claim, too. The founding fathers would by no stretch of the imagination recognize the modern evangelical christian as a brother.) If we accept Mullins argument that the US’s founding principles are christian then we have to accept that most countries’ are too.

What exactly are the principles he’s talking about? A peaceful society? Rule of law? Democratic rule? Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? These aren’t principles over which christianity can claim a monopoly. As one founding father pointed out these principles are self evident. One doesn’t need a Santa Claus in the sky to grant them or teach them, an intelligent human seeking the best possible existence can realize their necessity.

Passionate, generalized, baseless arguments are what this diatribe – and most evangelical political thought – is based upon. It’s time to call people like Mullins out on it.

Headlines – Some News Stories Worth Reading

Thursday, May 15th, 2008

School Forced by Activist Judge to Play Christian Video – Originally deemed as violating the First Amendment by school officials, a video and announcement promoting a christian prayer group is being crammed down the school’s throat.

Responses to the Evangelical Manifesto:

Retired Soldiers Encouraged to Use GI Bill to Pay for Missionary Training – I can’t say that I have a problem with this. If one has done what it takes to earn this right – and a right it should and hopefully will be once again under the new GI Bill unless the Conservatives manage to block it – then they should have the right to use the money for any legitimate education that they see fit.

Huckabee Scaring the Bejeezus out of Republicans

Friday, January 4th, 2008

The big wheels in the Republican Party got a scary wake up call yesterday. Huckabee’s win in Iowa makes the possibility his nomination as their candidate a little too real for comfort. So long as they stay members of the House of Representatives or governors of unimportant states, the party is glad to throw a few crumbs to the Evangelical Christian politicians in their party. But when they start knocking on the doors of real power it’s time to release the hounds.

While the true believers are heralding this as a sign that the Republican Party will at last be theirs, the Republican machine wants to shut Huckabee down. When Giuliani started to implode at the end of 2007 the leaders in the party were horrified to see Huckabee of all people start to rise in the vacuum left. Rich Lowry of the National Review and Nachama Soloveichik, spokeswoman for the Club for Growth, have both been speaking out against Huckabee since December. Hell, they’ve even dusted off Bob Dole to give him a go at the Huckster.

What the Evangelicals don’t get is that the party only wants them for their votes. They don’t even want their money; they get plenty from their corporate masters. All that they want from the Christians is for them to show up on Election Day, vote for the anti-abortion party then go home and shut-up. But now that Huckabee, the first real evangelical with a real shot at the candidacy, is suddenly really real they’re scared.

Don’t get me wrong, the idea of a Huckabee administration scares the bejeezus out of me, too. But a Huckabee nomination? Well, that’s a different story altogether. Huckabee winning the nomination would virtually lock in any of the three Deomocratic front runners. It would also signal the end of Republican Party as we know it and perhaps altogether. With Huckabee in the race the Bloomberg third party run that we’ve been hearing about would be assured and the corporate wing of the Republican Party would flock to his side. All the horrors and delights of a split ticket would then ensue.

But, as lovely as that sounds it’s not going to happen. The GOP will come to its senses before they crown Huckabee. My prediction? I see McCain as the man standing when the dust settles.

Why I’m Watching Christians

Friday, January 4th, 2008

I’ve been thinking about this first entry for a few days. When I start reading a new blog and want to learn what it’s about – its mission and the blogger’s vision – I generally skip to the first entry where these things are laid out. Assuming others will do this too I want to very clear about what I have in mind for Christian Watch.

First let me say that I don’t have a problem with Christians. The very nature of this project may seem to communicate something else. But I tell you that as an American most of my friends and family are Christians and I love and respect them. I was raised a Christian, a Southern Baptist to be exact, so I understand from where they are coming.

The second thing that you should know about me is that I’m an Atheist. This isn’t something that I spend a lot of time dwelling on but it’s there. I’m not a Satanist, Pagan or Witch; I simply believe that there is nothing beyond our physical bodies or death.

The third thing about me that you should know is that, despite those first two facts, this isn’t about some bitter, personal thing for me. I’ve already passed through that phase and, fun as it was, I don’t wish to return.

Now that I’ve said that, here’s why this blog exists. It seems to me that a very particular brand of Evangelical Christianity has grown at a disturbing rate in the US. It concerns me and I think that someone should be keeping an eye on it. I’m volunteering myself for that job.

This brand of Christianity has certain recognizable characteristics. As you read this list you will begin to recognize certain Evangelical Christians in it; some that you know personally and some national figures.

  • It is almost completely American
  • It is mostly Protestant though not all Protestant churches are part of it and some independent Catholics are a part of it
  • It prefers to see itself as persecuted
  • It celebrates financial gains above all others
  • It is intensely political and has been fantastically successful at using grassroots techniques to reach its political ends
  • It embraces only certain, convenient teachings from the Bible
  • It is quick to forgive even the most vile sins of its members while relentlessly condemning those that it perceives as “outsiders” of every foible
  • It considers a devotion to its tenets as necessary to patriotism

Having said all of that I now say this: The vast majority of these Evangelicals are truly sincere. At their core they are committed, dedicated people who believe that the movement they are involved in is good and will benefit humanity.

They are also dupes. I’m sure that most of them would be offended by this assertion – most people would be. But that’s the truth. Ever since Nixon’s Southern Strategy whereby he succeeded in embracing the Dixie-land white racists who felt alienated by a Democratic Party after it helped put the civil rights movement in motion the Republican Party and Evangelicals have continued to move closer and closer. While Nixon’s Southern Strategy was obviously a cynical (and smart) move to appeal to racism, it also had an element of overt Christianity that appealed to not only the Baptists in the South but Evangelicals across the nation.

The joining of these factions was consecrated by Rev. Jerry Falwell in the ‘80’s when he oversaw the marriage between the Republican Party and Christian Evangelicals by wholeheartedly inserting himself into the current administration, despite Reagan’s many transgressions of the code that would come to define the evangelical political movement.

And they were strange bedfellows, indeed. The Republican Party had for a long time been the friend of big business and was, mythically, the standard-bearer for hawk-ism in American. Neither of these conceits fit in any comfortable way with the New Testament’s vision of Christianity. One can point out the Calvinist/Protestant wealth-is-good philosophy but there is really little basis for it in the Bible. Sitting that aside I don’t believe that corporate personhood or favoring the global economy over the American worker are supportable by Calvin. Environmentalism, right to life (which used to mean anti-death penalty), equality among races, and fiscal responsibility – all issues that had once been issues of the Republican Party at one time or another and to varying degrees of universal acceptance – were abandoned for a few very narrow goals.

Since the marriage the Republican Party has been about very few issues. The main thrust of their governing when they’ve been in power has been creating and maintaining instability and suppression throughout the world. They accomplish this by supporting iron-fisted dictators and through war with a goal of keeping America at the top of the heap in an uncertain and dangerous world. Their second purpose has been the relentless support of big business. Their third concern has been the contentment of the American Evangelical Christian. These three things all work to keep Republicans in power. While some of the small time Republican politicians may be sincere people who are trying to support their daddy’s party, most are simply gathering power for power’s sake.

This is why the Christian Evangelicals that have done so much to support this party are dupes. They have supported the power hungry mad-men at the top because they believe that they have common beliefs. While many evangelicals have become increasingly uncomfortable with this marriage as they see it’s manifestations in the atrocities of the G. W. Bush administration one issue keeps them in the party – abortion.

I won’t drag you through the familiar history here except to say that it’s amazing that in a plural society such as ours where nobody can agree whole-heartedly with everything that is allowed that the Christian Evangelicals would allow one issue to make them embrace a party that in almost every other way represents the antithesis of their core beliefs. I get that they view abortion as murder and I can understand their fervor to change the law that allows it. But what I don’t understand is that they choose to join a party that joyfully embraces so many other forms of killing and suppression of human rights and dignity to reach their goal.

But they do and in their fanaticism that, though grounded in sincere and admirable beliefs, leads them to unquestionably support the party and its insane positions. Thus we have Christians doing bizarre, irrational and unchristian things. They believe that when the corporations whose autonomy they support instruct their greeters to say happy holidays instead of merry christmas that this is somehow a manifestation of a left-wing assault on christmas. They believe that harassing and murdering abortion doctors is right. They believe that blurring the lines between church and state is a good thing to do not realizing that their church may one day be found unfit for the state.

I could go on with this list but that is why I’ve set up this blog. These irrational acts of these evangelical dupes are what I plan to monitor here.

A Word About Comments:
I’m establishing this blog with an open comment policy. I ask that your comments be on point and not personal. If they are not they will be edited or removed. I encourage other’s views that disagree with mine but rude and inappropriate language will not be tolerated.